tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post2943040193321907863..comments2024-03-18T17:10:39.347+05:30Comments on E=mc^2: Telangana 76: Tunisia and EgyptSujaihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16539694685428659940noreply@blogger.comBlogger532125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-40030150455588499702011-02-28T00:48:58.595+05:302011-02-28T00:48:58.595+05:30In the case of Egypt there was a very narrow but ...In the case of Egypt there was a very narrow but explicit goal: get rid of Mubarak. Then there was a broader goal: get rid of the ruling elite. Same in the case of Telangana Agitation the Narrow goal is the Formation of a Separate state, the broader goal is still very ambiguous ,But what they are doing in Egypt is kind of an inspiring model, but you can’t duplicate it elsewhere. So for example, what is happening in Libya is not identical to what is happening in Egypt. They have different circumstances and different problems. The same is true with the Telangana Agitation.TGnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-55330799516110275542011-02-17T14:33:39.857+05:302011-02-17T14:33:39.857+05:30THE METHODS OF NONVIOLENT PROTEST AND PERSUASION
...THE METHODS OF NONVIOLENT PROTEST AND PERSUASION <br /><br />Formal Statements <br />1. Public Speeches <br />2. Letters of opposition or support <br />3. Declarations by organizations and institutions <br />4. Signed public statements <br />5. Declarations of indictment and intention <br />6. Group or mass petitions <br /><br />Communications with a Wider Audience <br />7. Slogans, caricatures, and symbols <br />8. Banners, posters, and displayed communications <br />9. Leaflets, pamphlets, and books <br />10. Newspapers and journals <br />11. Records, radio, and television <br />12. Skywriting and earthwriting <br /><br />Group Representations <br />13. Deputations <br />14. Mock awards <br />15. Group lobbying <br />16. Picketing <br />17. Mock elections <br /><br />Symbolic Public Acts <br />18. Displays of flags and symbolic colors <br />19. Wearing of symbols <br />20. Prayer and worship <br />21. Delivering symbolic objects <br />22. Protest disrobings <br />23. Destruction of own property <br />24. Symbolic lights <br />25. Displays of portraits <br />26. Paint as protest <br />27. New signs and names <br />28. Symbolic sounds <br />29. Symbolic reclamations <br />30. Rude gestures <br /><br />Pressures on Individuals <br />31. "Haunting" officials <br />32. Taunting officials <br />33. Fraternization <br />34. Vigils <br /><br />Drama and Music <br />35. Humorous skits and pranks <br />36. Performances of plays and music <br />37. Singing <br /><br />Processions <br />38. Marches <br />39. Parades <br />40. Religious processions <br />41. Pilgrimages <br />42. Motorcades <br /><br />Honoring the Dead <br />43. Political mourning <br />44. Mock funerals <br />45. Demonstrative funerals <br />46. Homage at burial places <br /><br />Public Assemblies <br />47. Assemblies of protest or support <br />48. Protest meetings <br />49. Camouflaged meetings of protest <br />50. Teach-ins <br /><br />Withdrawal and Renunciation <br />51. Walk-outs <br />52. Silence <br />53. Renouncing honors <br />54. Turning one's back <br /><br /><br />THE METHODS OF SOCIAL NONCOOPERATION <br /><br />Ostracism of Persons <br />55. Social boycott <br />56. Selective social boycott <br />57. Lysistratic nonaction <br />58. Excommunication <br />59. Interdict <br /><br />Noncooperation with Social Events, Customs, and Institutions <br />60. Suspension of social and sports activities <br />61. Boycott of social affairs <br />62. Student strike <br />63. Social disobedience <br />64. Withdrawal from social institutions <br /><br />Withdrawal from the Social System <br />65. Stay-at-home <br />66. Total personal noncooperation <br />67. "Flight" of workers <br />68. Sanctuary <br />69. Collective disappearance <br />70. Protest emigration (hijrat) <br /><br /><br />THE METHODS OF ECONOMIC NONCOOPERATION: (1) ECONOMIC BOYCOTTS <br /><br />Actions by Consumers <br />71. Consumers' boycott <br />72. Nonconsumption of boycotted goods <br />73. Policy of austerity <br />74. Rent withholding <br />75. Refusal to rent <br />76. National consumers' boycott <br />77. International consumers' boycott <br /><br />Action by Workers and Producers <br />78. Workmen's boycott <br />79. Producers' boycott <br /><br />Action by Middlemen <br />80. Suppliers' and handlers' boycott <br /><br />Action by Owners and Management <br />81. Traders' boycott <br />82. Refusal to let or sell property <br />83. Lockout <br />84. Refusal of industrial assistance <br />85. Merchants' "general strike" <br /><br />Action by Holders of Financial Resources <br />86. Withdrawal of bank deposits <br />87. Refusal to pay fees, dues, and assessments <br />88. Refusal to pay debts or interest <br />89. Severance of funds and credit198 ways of Non violent protestsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-21959680362360932652011-02-17T08:23:40.617+05:302011-02-17T08:23:40.617+05:30@sera
can you share us your presentation to srikri...@sera<br />can you share us your presentation to srikrishna to better understand your concerns.I am another curious Hyderabadi.iqbalnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-42256721951041444782011-02-14T09:21:24.704+05:302011-02-14T09:21:24.704+05:30http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjb_fuvdzhU
http...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjb_fuvdzhU<br /><br /><br /><br />http://www.aeinstein.org/organizationsc5ed.htmlguide for REVOLUTIONnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-46833781702468610672011-02-14T09:19:17.737+05:302011-02-14T09:19:17.737+05:30http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/14/world/middleeast...http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/14/world/middleeast/14egypt-tunisia-protests.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&hpwegypt lessons for telangananoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-69916141623651971012011-02-12T14:24:21.321+05:302011-02-12T14:24:21.321+05:30@ SLB:
I do watch Raj TV as well as other channel...@ SLB:<br /><br />I do watch Raj TV as well as other channels but did not see the conspiracy stories you mentioned.<br /><br />You are mistaken if you infer I parrot anyone's version without applying my mind. BTW this is mutual: I do not imply you do so either.<br /><br />Another clarification: I take assertions in good faith unless I can disprove them. I know most activists on either side (and on all sides of any debate) are selective in their quotes. This does not mean I accuse anyone of deliberate falsehood or forgery. Nor can one dismiss presented evidence just because contrary evidence was omitted.<br /><br />You are welcome to your view that Vishalandhra with Hyderabad *city* as *capital* emerged from the response of Telangana leaders.<br /><br />I do not believe your clippings prove this adequately. There is tons of evidence of Andhra desire for Vishalandhra including Hyderabad *state* as well as other areas much before that. I believe the idea of Hyderabad as capital emerged as the andhra state formation became close to reality.<br /><br />I am not alleging a conspiracy here, just repuditing the idea of "you invited us" being flaunted by SAvadis.<br /><br />I did not see Ramkishen Rao's letter submitted to SKC (BTW by whom). I am referring to the copy released by Narsing Rao from his father's archive.<br /><br />I do not believe it was forged as you appear to allege. For one, there is too much context to have been "created" much later. To my knowledge, "office copies" are on plain paper and not signed.<br /><br />SRC's interpretation of Telangana feelings on merger becomes clear if you juxtapose it with the comments on andhra support to Vishalandhra.<br /><br />Nehru was (atleast not yet) the party. Many decisions taken during his reign were against his preferences.<br /><br />Prof. Jayashankar may be guru of KCR but this does not mean targeting him is correct. SAvadis can oppose his views but bestowing the choicest of language on him (and Prof. Kodandaram) is unfair in my view.<br /><br />This is probably my last visit to this post. Please respond at the current post if you wish.Jainoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-90467500494566645272011-02-11T12:12:48.818+05:302011-02-11T12:12:48.818+05:30The change in 1950's was that of Hyderabad as ...<i>The change in 1950's was that of Hyderabad as a capital. .... abscence of infrastructure & Kurnool-Vijayawada rivalries came to the fore.</i><br />Kurnool-Vijayawada rivalry was a fact and so the lack of infrastructure . <b>Vishalandhra with Hyderabad as capital was not in scheme of things.</b><br />The news items I posted indicate them very well. My view is Hyderabad as capital has come out only after Telangana MPs initiated it.<br /><br /><i>Prof. Jayashankar deserves .... it was the outcome of manipulative politics."</i><br />I watched him twice on RajNews talking the merger as conspiracy.<br />Everbody would have accpted his theory, had he said it like a political analyst or ring-side viewer.<br />But he is opposer of the merger since his college days (hope you know he was just out of college when merger happened).<br />His story is one-sided. One example: in his articles he quoted many newspaper reports on Andhra leaders. But he did not quote anything about any of Hyderabad state leaders.<br /><br /><i>SRC did record the opposition of Telangana people: "public opinion in Telangana has still to crystallize itself".</i><br />How can you infer indecision as opposition? Even then, does it amount to "majority of Telanganas opposed merger"? <br /><br /><br /><i>Burgula Ramkishen Rao's letter to AICC president UN Dhebar also records this</i><br />Sorry for being harsh. Most The bogus evidence brought out in T discussions.<br />Did you see the scanned version submitted to SKC?<br />Can you show BRK's name or signature or seal or initial anywhere on the letter?<br /><br /><i>GMA is a comproomise formulsa that evolved out of attempts by the "high command" to reconcile the two groups.</i><br />Fyi.. Nehru ridiculed GMA.<br /><br /><br /><i>Though offtopic, I want to raise another subject. SAvadis routinely attack Prof. Jayashankar & Prof. Kodandaram almost at "KCR levels". </i><br />In case you do not know, Prof. Jayashankar is KCR's Telangana guru. Hope my above explanation helps you understand Prof. Jayashankar's one-sided story.<br />I suggest you onething. Watch his RajNews program on merger conspiracy with a neutral mind. Now compare the facts vs his assertions. You will understand his attitude.SLBnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-1079760843157352062011-02-10T23:39:49.473+05:302011-02-10T23:39:49.473+05:30ఐఎస్ఐ ఏజెంట్గా అనుమానిస్తూ వ్యక్తి అరెస్ట్
హైదర...<b>ఐఎస్ఐ ఏజెంట్గా అనుమానిస్తూ వ్యక్తి అరెస్ట్</b><br /><br />హైదరాబాద్ : ఐఎస్ఐ ఏజెంటుగా అనుమానిస్తూ సోహైల్ అనే వ్యక్తిని సైబరాబాద్ పోలీసులు కుషాయిగూడలో గురువారం అదుపులోకి తీసుకున్నారు. పోలీసులు అతన్ని విచారిస్తున్నారు.<br /><br />- Sakshi, Feb 10, 2010<br /><br />Hoping this IS guy is not sera, I dont see him here from yesterday.Telangananoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-38062900868481264172011-02-10T13:52:29.708+05:302011-02-10T13:52:29.708+05:30Syed miya:
Utar aaye apni aukat peh, shahbash! Sh...Syed miya:<br /><br />Utar aaye apni aukat peh, shahbash! Shame on you for wanting to stay united with "vedavalu" & "sannasulu". Your morbid desire to be together with those whom you despise speaks volumes about your sick mentality.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-44510011212331289402011-02-10T13:32:22.026+05:302011-02-10T13:32:22.026+05:30Coneon guys this SOB's don't know the diff...Coneon guys this SOB's don't know the difference between good and bad, chaputam narkatham thats the only language they know and feel proud about it. antha talamaasina vedavalu..meeku telangana raadu ra sannasullara.<br /><br />Captcha :Fk YouSyed Habeeb Ullah Quadrinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-11611940733121273862011-02-10T12:52:55.695+05:302011-02-10T12:52:55.695+05:30@Karim:
Telanganites (including religious & l...@Karim:<br /><br />Telanganites (including religious & linguistic minorities) have been marginalized by the carpetbaggers from Andhra. They are now trying to "divide & rule" by splitting us into Hyderabad vs. other districts, Telugu vs. non-Telugu, Hindu vs. Muslim etc.<br /><br />Many SAvadis claim MIM is against Telangana. While it is true that they prefer AP to continue, it is truer that they identify fully with Telangana. No MIM leader has supported the SA view that Muslims or Hyderabad is culturally or otherwise different from Telangana.Jainoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-34776619401819750972011-02-10T12:31:57.655+05:302011-02-10T12:31:57.655+05:30@Sera:
I do not dispute the authenticity of the D...@Sera:<br /><br />I do not dispute the authenticity of the DC poll. However these (TV/web polls) are hardly indicative of the true picture as it is restricted to netizens only. The extent of participation is highly suspect in all such polls.<br /><br />I am actually surprised at the low % polled by # 1 (the true choice of Savadis). They are all climbing on the # 6 bandwagon just because it is recommended by SKC. Almost no SAvadi supported safeguards like TRC either before or after the report.Jainoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-44847692915988247362011-02-10T12:23:30.330+05:302011-02-10T12:23:30.330+05:30@SLB:
The theory of Vishalandhra was promoted rig...@SLB:<br /><br />The theory of Vishalandhra was promoted right from the begining of the century. YMLA developed a map of Andhradesa that included Telugu-speaking provinces of Madras, Hyderabad, CP & Mysore. AMS (not NAMS) under Venkatappayya held a conference on this demand as far back as 1913.<br /><br />The change in 1950's was that of Hyderabad as a capital. The idea of Vishalandhra itself was much older and mostly driven by coastal leaders. The capital issue became prominent as Andhra state started becoming a reality and the abscence of infrastructure & Kurnool-Vijayawada rivalries came to the fore.<br /><br />Prof. Jayashankar deserves to be congratulated for highlighting Fazal Ali recommendations when everyone forgot them. He does not allege conspiracy. He merely observed "Yet, paradoxically, the state of AP was formed- ignoring the<br />wishes of people of Telangana, against a categorical recommendation of the SRC and contrary to<br />the views of the tallest leader of the time, Jawaharlal Nehru. It was the outcome of manipulative<br />politics."<br /><br />SRC did record the opposition of Telangana people: "public opinion in Telangana has still to crystallize itself".<br /><br />Burgula Ramkishen Rao's letter to AICC president UN Dhebar also records this. Excerpts: "there is a strong agitation in Telangana<br />not to merge with Andhra" and "My<br />estimate of the views of the people of Telangana is that the people by<br />majority would desire Telangana to remain a separate state. There is a strong section of the people holding the other view, that is<br />in favour of Vishalandhra, but the majority is decidedly in favour of<br />retaining Telangana as a separate province as recommended by the<br />S.R.C. "<br /><br />GMA is a comproomise formulsa that evolved out of attempts by the "high command" to reconcile the two groups.<br /><br />Though offtopic, I want to raise another subject. SAvadis routinely attack Prof. Jayashankar & Prof. Kodandaram almost at "KCR levels". While KCR (mostly) brought these attacks upon himself through his loud mouth, these two gentlemen are polite to the core.Jainoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-81104763952614061172011-02-10T08:12:55.932+05:302011-02-10T08:12:55.932+05:30A nice article written in Simply Telangana.
http:...A nice article written in Simply Telangana.<br /><br />http://www.simplytelangana.com/2011/02/10/should-trs-merge-with-congress/tintinnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-90170691718867826062011-02-10T02:08:59.862+05:302011-02-10T02:08:59.862+05:30శ్రీకృష్ణ కమిటీకి చట్టబద్ధత లేదు
హైదరాబాద్, న్యూస్...<b>శ్రీకృష్ణ కమిటీకి చట్టబద్ధత లేదు</b><br />హైదరాబాద్, న్యూస్లైన్: <b>ప్రత్యేక తెలంగాణ ఉద్యమ నేపథ్యంలో ఏర్పాటైన జస్టిస్ శ్రీకృష్ణ కమిటీకి ఎలాంటి చట్టబద్ధతా లేదని కేంద్ర ప్రభుత్వం స్పష్టం చేసింది.</b> అది సంప్రదింపుల కమిటీ మాత్రమేనని, కమిషన్స్ ఆఫ్ ఎంక్వయిరీస్ చట్టం 1952 కింద ఏర్పాటు కాలేదని అటార్నీ జనరల్ గులాం ఇ.వాహనవతి తేల్చి చెప్పారు. కమిటీ సూచించిన పరిష్కారాలు న్యాయ సమీక్ష పరిధిలోకి రావని పేర్కొన్నారు. నివేదికపై న్యాయ సమీక్ష జరిపే పరిధి కోర్టులకు లేదని స్పష్టం చేశారు. కమిటీ సిఫారసుల్లో తప్పొప్పులను తేల్చడానికి న్యాయస్థానాలు ఏ మాత్రం వేదికలు కాదని కుండబద్దలు కొట్టారు.<br /><br /><b>మావోయిస్టులు, శాంతిభద్రతల అంశాలు కమిటీ నివేదికకు ఆధారం ఏ మాత్రమూ కావని ఆయన చెప్పారు.</b> ‘‘కమిటీ పరిధి కూడా తక్కువే. తెలంగాణ రాష్ట్ర ఏర్పాటుకు సంబంధించి ప్రభుత్వానికి అది ఎలాంటి సలహాలు, సూచనలు ఇవ్వలేదు.<br />కేంద్రం కోరినట్టుగా ఒకటి కంటే ఎక్కువ పరిష్కారాలను సూచించింది. వాటిని విధిగా అమలు చేయాల్సిన అవసరం కూడా లేదు. ఆ పరిష్కారాలను పరిశీలించాక, రాష్ట్ర ప్రయోజనాలను దృష్టిలో పెట్టుకుని కేంద్రం తుది నిర్ణయం తీసుకుంటుంది’’ అని విన్నవించారు. <br /><br />Sakshi - 10 Feb, 2011కిరణ్ కుమార్ కేhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054084645595458895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-87381779536543780172011-02-09T23:22:08.366+05:302011-02-09T23:22:08.366+05:30@sera
>>The problem is that from the time of...@sera<br />>>The problem is that from the time of the merger that is the way you have marginalized us.<br /><br />Many of the reports say the workforce of Muslims in HYD percentage is drastically reduced between the times now and time of merge. What ever the reasons ....we never blamed anyone. It is foolish(IMO) to say some of the Hyderabadies are marginalized by TG people because the were always minorities in HYD.Karimnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-64353784481359692832011-02-09T21:58:07.757+05:302011-02-09T21:58:07.757+05:30First these SA crony capitalists and sera like kup...First these SA crony capitalists and sera like kupastha mandukalu...<br />instigate the anguish and victimise the innocent students and make them frustated.<br />Then comes the police force,barbed wires,rubber bullets,pellets,merciless lathicharges..<br />and when the pure hearted students like srikanth chary,venugopal reddy,Yadaiah and eshan reddy<br />self immolated...istead of looking into the sorrows of telangana people these SA idiots<br />ask us not to fall in victimhood mentality and say that it will tint our view...<br /><br />These SA idiots even forget the basic humanity...buggars...<br /><br />Freinds it has been almost an year since Yadaiah sacrificed his life http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8527605.stmWarangalnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-77355098652694762192011-02-09T19:04:13.990+05:302011-02-09T19:04:13.990+05:30@sera
I dont have to dismiss, it is open secret, ...@sera<br /><br />I dont have to dismiss, it is open secret, majority of SA want Option2 or Option4 when the bifurcation is must. They like these options because they feel these are the revenge. They cant express this publicly because they publicly support United Andhra, they couldn't keep it inside either, some times they express there venom in the form of SKC or sera. <br /><br /> Sakshi say Jagan is super hero, Studio N say Babu is Monarch, Raj TV say KCR is modern Potti Ramulu of Telangana. Who cares deccan cronical is no exception.Mangal Pandeynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-1516000194909942922011-02-09T18:38:27.788+05:302011-02-09T18:38:27.788+05:30These stories are before 1953. There is sufficient...<i>These stories are before 1953. There is sufficient evidence that the mood changed after 1953.</i><br />Jai,<br />I do not contest change of mood. Even before 1953 response of Telangana leaders was not highly enthusiastic about Vishalndhra. At the same it was not against too.<br /><br />But my stand w.r.t conspiracy propaganda (of Prof. Jayashankar in particular) is<br /><br />1. Hyderabad was not originally among scheme of things for Vishalandhra. The initial call, rather invitation, was given by T leaders only. So trying to project Vishalamdhra dream as conspiracy is very bad. In TRS words "prajala manobhavaalani debbateesutnid". <br /><br />2. There was change in mood after 1953. Or maybe we can say forces that were not party to Vishalndhra came out in open only after 1953. But as such there was no proof to say "majority of Telangana were against merger". Even SRC recorded only apprehensions and not exactly the opposition.<br /><br />Well this is only w.r.t merger. Please do not mix again with GA.SLBnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-35807402585622621962011-02-09T18:32:44.801+05:302011-02-09T18:32:44.801+05:30Mangal Pandey said...
sera is not SA, actually he ...<i>Mangal Pandey said...<br />sera is not SA, actually he is an ISI agent, his ultimate goal is to separate HYD from India and merge it with Pakistan thus fulfilling the Nizam's dream, who invited them to HYD centuries ago(paying back). People know his intension, that why there is no public support for him.<br /><br />There is some support for each option including Rayala telangana, no support at all for Option-4.</i><br /><br />You got one thing right in so may words - that I am not SA. Mangal Pandey - hmmm, I like that identity.<br /><br />And as for the last part check out http://www.deccanchronicle.com/<br /><br />You will find Option 1 and Option 4 have 6% support each while the Rayala Telangana (option 3) has 1% and the option 2 has 4%. The option 5 has 33% while the Option 6 has 49%. Check their homepage right hand side.<br /><br />Of course you could dismiss Deccan Chronicle like you dismiss SKC. I leave that to you.seranoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-53341496593912728672011-02-09T16:29:18.822+05:302011-02-09T16:29:18.822+05:30sera is not SA, actually he is an ISI agent, his u...sera is not SA, actually he is an ISI agent, his ultimate goal is to separate HYD from India and merge it with Pakistan thus fulfilling the Nizam's dream, who invited them to HYD centuries ago(paying back). People know his intension, that why there is no public support for him.<br /><br />There is some support for each option including Rayala telangana, no support at all for Option-4.Mangal Pandeynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-41760726204483360732011-02-09T16:03:59.512+05:302011-02-09T16:03:59.512+05:30call us Maoist and call us Anti nationals for aski...<i>call us Maoist and call us Anti nationals for asking our own state. </i><br /><br />If that feels you good, I dont stop you. I know very well that 'us' in your sentence counts 'one'.<br /><br />:)seranoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-54683780434773583332011-02-09T15:39:18.526+05:302011-02-09T15:39:18.526+05:30[Nice way of calling us pigs TWICE.]
If that feel...[<i>Nice way of calling us pigs TWICE.</i>]<br /><br />If that feels you good, I dont stop you. I know very well that 'us' in your sentence counts 'one'.<br /><br />:)కిరణ్ కుమార్ కేhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054084645595458895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-50145316738550222062011-02-09T15:36:22.560+05:302011-02-09T15:36:22.560+05:30When ever we raised our voices, India atleast star...<i>When ever we raised our voices, India atleast started there debate, but even pig dont cares about Option4. </i><br /><br />Nice way of calling us pigs TWICE. Now we know what you think of us which we always suspected.seranoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-19156776925057965832011-02-09T15:34:30.791+05:302011-02-09T15:34:30.791+05:30this land thirsty (of what asking which was not be...<i>this land thirsty (of what asking which was not belongs to him) is similar to Pakistan ideas, which tried to occupy Kashmir in disguise of locals.</i><br /><br />Very similar to what I feel too.seranoreply@blogger.com