tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post5318215967617642552..comments2024-03-18T17:10:39.347+05:30Comments on E=mc^2: Revealed in Chapter 8: Formula on how to subvert democracy in this countrySujaihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16539694685428659940noreply@blogger.comBlogger42125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-78674723195820001822011-04-01T15:16:22.029+05:302011-04-01T15:16:22.029+05:30[please go ahead and dig up your sources and then ...[<i>please go ahead and dig up your sources and then paste the link. </i>]<br /> <br />If Anti T-vadis can't show proofs, it does mean SA leaders are against the releasing Chapter8. Because they say they demanded for release but cant show the proof, so they are faking about their demand to release chapter8కిరణ్ కుమార్ కేhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054084645595458895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-43486348823389768002011-04-01T15:03:29.735+05:302011-04-01T15:03:29.735+05:30[First you asked for proof. When I quoted TV discu...[<i>First you asked for proof. When I quoted TV discussions, you are not accepting.</i>]<br /> <br />[<i>BTW, you have not yet shown "proof" for the SA leaders opposing this. </i>]<br /><br />Here is my proof.<br /><br />On ABN channel discussion, a SA leaders (I dont remember the names) Mar 08, apposing the releasing chapter8 saying that was hidden for everyones good and national security. The other leaders at that time Veerasiva, Umamaheswar and Samual(?) supported that argument.కిరణ్ కుమార్ కేhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054084645595458895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-8043281287836301082011-04-01T14:54:23.578+05:302011-04-01T14:54:23.578+05:30This comment has been removed by the author.కిరణ్ కుమార్ కేhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054084645595458895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-26750564055766111942011-04-01T14:53:04.241+05:302011-04-01T14:53:04.241+05:30You are degrading yourself and your movement too. ...<i>You are degrading yourself and your movement too. </i><br /><br />No, he is not.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-30826895602729230452011-04-01T13:40:23.610+05:302011-04-01T13:40:23.610+05:30Till then please do not waste my time.
Why not ad...<i>Till then please do not waste my time.</i><br /><br />Why not admit you can not answer simple questions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-33766291261758337172011-04-01T12:57:03.810+05:302011-04-01T12:57:03.810+05:30Till then please do not waste my time
You are deg...<i>Till then please do not waste my time</i><br /><br />You are degrading yourself and your movement too.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-17139309638303558552011-04-01T11:16:49.438+05:302011-04-01T11:16:49.438+05:30When I quoted TV discussions, you are not acceptin...<i>When I quoted TV discussions, you are not accepting.</i><br /><br />My grandmother sees ghosts. But that is not good enough 'proof' for existence of ghosts. <br /><br />Sometimes some observations are considered 'obvious' and hence do not require proof. Some observations are contested, and that's when you need to provide a direct or indirect proof. If it is direct proof, it make it easy. Sometimes indirect proofs also helps provided the other party recognizes it as reasonable. In absence of proofs, contentious issues will not be resolved. <br /><br />Though we knew that Andhras ALSO demolished statues, we did not raise that till we got enough evidence. So, please go ahead and dig up your sources and then paste the link. <br /><br />Till then please do not waste my time.Sujaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16539694685428659940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-27249198942611087422011-04-01T10:27:03.820+05:302011-04-01T10:27:03.820+05:30No. Only a link to a news item or a link to a yout...<i>No. Only a link to a news item or a link to a youtube would help. </i><br /><br />First you asked for proof. When I quoted TV discussions, you are not accepting.<br />Do you mean that info on internet only is the real proof?<br /><br />BTW, you have not yet shown <b>"proof"</b> for the SA leaders opposing this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-50866729061676069152011-04-01T03:37:26.751+05:302011-04-01T03:37:26.751+05:30[Again typical of you T-vaadis. Thing that you do ...[<i>Again typical of you T-vaadis. Thing that you do not see or cannot see does not exists. </i>]<br /> <br />Typical Anti-T vadis(in disguise of Samakyavadis), they talk much, do less, and never show proofs for there arguments. If T-vadis show any proofs, they simply reject is saying that proofs made in Prof, JayaShankar's factory. <br /><br />Typical mentality of Anti-T vadis, they want to stay together with home they hate neck deep.కిరణ్ కుమార్ కేhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054084645595458895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-23037376004876615092011-03-31T23:13:05.081+05:302011-03-31T23:13:05.081+05:30Do you want SA leaders organize a Mahagarjana to d...<i>Do you want SA leaders organize a Mahagarjana to demand publishing chapter-8?</i><br /><br />No. Only a link to a news item or a link to a youtube would help. <br /><br />You are being a idiot on this blog. I have very little patience to put up with idiots.Sujaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16539694685428659940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-49646163955402972482011-03-31T23:05:12.364+05:302011-03-31T23:05:12.364+05:30So, that's your proof?
Do you want SA leaders...<i>So, that's your proof?</i><br /><br />Do you want SA leaders organize a Mahagarjana to demand publishing chapter-8?<br /><br />BTW, who are the SA leaders opposing publishing chapter 8?<br /><b>And your proof?</b>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-75427685421242799922011-03-31T22:57:33.607+05:302011-03-31T22:57:33.607+05:30SA leaders said Chapter 8 should be published bu t...<i>SA leaders said Chapter 8 should be published bu t took objections to Judge's remarks.<br />You want names? Paladugu Venkat rao and Varla Ramayya on HM TV.<br />Also there was one lady from Seema (I do not remember name).</i><br /><br />So, that's your proof?Sujaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16539694685428659940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-33160048072085650322011-03-31T22:43:27.719+05:302011-03-31T22:43:27.719+05:30BTW, sujai internet is not the only source of info...BTW, sujai internet is not the only source of information for everything.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-50134148112723376572011-03-31T22:42:03.603+05:302011-03-31T22:42:03.603+05:30But none of you actually provide a link.
This is ...<i>But none of you actually provide a link.</i><br /><br />This is the fun with your arguments.<br /><br />You ignored the question on discussion on TV channels. SA leaders said Chapter 8 should be published bu t took objections to Judge's remarks.<br />You want names? Paladugu Venkat rao and Varla Ramayya on HM TV.<br />Also there was one lady from Seema (I do not remember name).<br /><br />Can you show proof for any SA leader opposing publishing this chapter? Of course other than Lagadapati. :-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-11371939312565040592011-03-31T22:33:35.178+05:302011-03-31T22:33:35.178+05:30Seemandhra 1:
You simply made an assumption that t...Seemandhra 1:<br /><i>You simply made an assumption that they are opposing. But when somebody says no they are not opposing you want proof.</i><br /><br />Seemandhra 2:<br /><i>It is universal truth you dont read anything which is against your thinking or Telangana formation. Same way you ignored reading such news.</i><br /><br />Seemandhra 3:<br /><i>Again typical of you T-vaadis. Thing that you do not see or cannot see does not exists.</i><br /><br /><b>But none of you actually provide a link.</b>Sujaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16539694685428659940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-37031430188609145442011-03-31T21:55:04.077+05:302011-03-31T21:55:04.077+05:30Why do they rather want to oppose such a move and ...<i>Why do they rather want to oppose such a move and keep the chapter 'secret'? </i><br />You simply made an assumption that they are opposing. But when somebody says no they are not opposing you want proof.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-57442046033165011882011-03-31T21:02:48.879+05:302011-03-31T21:02:48.879+05:30May be the newspapers that I get have a filter. I ...<i>May be the newspapers that I get have a filter. I didn't find news items where Samaikhyandhras asked for Chapter 8 to be made public. </i><br /><br />It is universal truth you dont read anything which is against your thinking or Telangana formation. Same way you ignored reading such news.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-57720850091272627022011-03-31T20:31:09.116+05:302011-03-31T20:31:09.116+05:30May be the newspapers that I get have a filter. I ...<i>May be the newspapers that I get have a filter. I didn't find news items where Samaikhyandhras asked for Chapter 8 to be made public. The news items that I read said the contrary. </i><br />No surprise that you write with so many assumptions.<br /><br />How much of TV shows you followed on that day? Did you watch discussions on iNews, HM TV, Maha TV?<br /><br />Again typical of you T-vaadis. Thing that you do not see or cannot see does not exists.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-87733135778326408372011-03-31T18:58:29.014+05:302011-03-31T18:58:29.014+05:30Quote:
"May be the newspapers that I get have...<b>Quote:<br />"</b><i>May be the newspapers that I get have a filter. </i><b>"</b><br /><br />Me too Sujai. Looks like I am in the Matrix world, and SA is in real world? thats why what I see is different from SA sees. Few other examples which do not match..<br /><br />* They say they respect grate peoples statues, in our world they destroyed few.<br />* They say they want Telugu Unity that there life, in our world they agitated for seperation.<br />* They say they are peaceful people, in our world they started the first violent movement in Independent India and lead few violent movements which brought the central govt to there knees. <br />* They say we are suffering with naxal problem, in our world we both regions has same number of govt. identified naxal impacted districts.<br />* They say we are drunkers, in our world it is SA districts bring more liquor income to govt. <br /><br />Like this there are many which dont match between our reality and there reality.కిరణ్ కుమార్ కేhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054084645595458895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-48935415189769142202011-03-31T17:41:21.451+05:302011-03-31T17:41:21.451+05:30Many senior and younger politicians from SA also s...<i>Many senior and younger politicians from SA also said that Chapter - 8 must be made public. </i><br /><br />May be the newspapers that I get have a filter. I didn't find news items where Samaikhyandhras asked for Chapter 8 to be made public. The news items that I read said the contrary. <br /><br />Can you please give links to those news items where Samaikhyandhras ask for Chapter 8 to be revealed?<br /><br />Thanks,Sujaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16539694685428659940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-11779751535695917112011-03-31T16:50:17.447+05:302011-03-31T16:50:17.447+05:30what exactly did the judge deliver finally. Is the...<i>what exactly did the judge deliver finally. Is the govt compelled to disclose chapter 8. can the govt say that it considers it unfeasible to make the note public?<br /></i><br />This judge knows very well that GOI will not publish that chapter. So he chose to publish some parts to rake up discussion.<br />Funny part here is SA media and people have to carry the blame until entire report is published and understood.<br />That is what the learned judge wants.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-73209397678566727692011-03-31T16:47:02.642+05:302011-03-31T16:47:02.642+05:30Since the judge quoted 'conveniently' some...<i>Since the judge quoted 'conveniently' some extractions from Chapter 8, why don't the Seemandhra activists push for revealing the complete Chapter? </i><br />In case you are not aware. Many senior and younger politicians from SA also said that Chapter - 8 must be made public. <br /><br />This is typical of you T-vaadis. Keep questioning something 'not done'. Why should they push for it? Your leader did that and got right order from court. <br /><br /><i>Why do they rather want to oppose such a move and keep the chapter 'secret'? </i><br />Why do you want to consider one or two odd fellows like Lagadapti as representatives of 'all'. There are hardly any SA leaders who opposed publishing the chapter 8.<br /><br /><i>Is it because this chapter will expose how Seemandhras 'doctored' SKC report?</i><br />Why do you comment on a point that is not even concluded? You made assumption that SA activists oppose publishing chapter-8. Even before your assumption validated, you make another comment.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-47280165330762025172011-03-31T14:43:41.789+05:302011-03-31T14:43:41.789+05:30what exactly did the judge deliver finally. Is the...what exactly did the judge deliver finally. Is the govt compelled to disclose chapter 8. can the govt say that it considers it unfeasible to make the note public?<br /><br />Two weeks are over.<br /><br />109. The writ petition is accordingly allowed, as prayed for. ......... The respondent shall consider the feasibility of<br />making the note on Chapter-VIII, public, within two weeks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-27551744209287785082011-03-31T10:53:09.742+05:302011-03-31T10:53:09.742+05:30The learned Judge only quoted (convenient) extract...<i>The learned Judge only quoted (convenient) extractions from Chapter 8.</i><br /><br />Since the judge quoted 'conveniently' some extractions from Chapter 8, why don't the Seemandhra activists push for revealing the complete Chapter? <br /><br />Why do they rather want to oppose such a move and keep the chapter 'secret'? <br /><br />Is it because this chapter will expose how Seemandhras 'doctored' SKC report?Sujaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16539694685428659940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-22146629460038076312011-03-31T06:28:15.394+05:302011-03-31T06:28:15.394+05:30Aravind:
Sujai posts comments on chapter 8 based ...Aravind:<br /><br />Sujai posts comments on chapter 8 based on the version released by the judge. Unless govt releases it, it has no credibility. <br /><br />Are you serious? You are suggesting that the order of a high court does not have credibility?! Thankfully, that is not how it works. If you are willing, I'd be happy to suggest some books for you to read. You may consider reading up prior to writing such stuff. And just out of curiosity, do you think the Srikrishna Committee 'report' is credible? <br /><br />Judge has hijacked and stepped on the powers of executive branch. <br /><br />Really, now. How, exactly? Hijacked the powers of the executive- has he enacted a legislation? I really want to know and look forward to your response. But may I request you to read up before you revert?<br /><br />Perhaps, everything is ok for Sujai if it lends to his bias. <br /><br />This does happen to be Sujai's blog! And 'bias'? And having an opinion different from yours on the Telangana issue is a bias? <br /><br />The judge has shown enthusiasm and bias towards Telangana by coming up with his version which are different from what the SKC said. <br /><br />Well, he does seem to have enthusiasm- which is a good thing! The judge has not come out with his 'version' on anything. The judged has quoted from the eight chapter of the badly drafted state sponsored political strategy consultation note-popularly known as the Srikrishna Committee Report on Telangana- and gave his views on the extracted paragraphs. That is NOT giving his 'version'. Again please read-this time, the order.<br /> <br />Being a person from Telangana, he can't judge the issue.. it has to be someone outside the state. <br /><br />Don't be ridiculous. Yes, he can. The respondent i.e. the Government of India did not think it was an issue or it would have brought it up and the matter would not be heard by him.<br /><br />Supreme court will decide the case and HC judge has no authority to 'selectively' release the contents.<br /><br />Has the respondent appealed to the Supreme Court? It would be interesting to know what it has to say. No authority to selectively release the content? I think the judge would know the limits of his authority more than you or me. So, tough luck that you don't like the order- that is, if you have read it.<br /><br />Aravind, apologies if I am being harsh-you could just be an excited school kid! <br /><br />Separately, I am astonished that the popular national television channels ignored this order. I haven't read or seen a single news report (or have I missed them?) where the media has condemned the suggestion of managing the media. May be its given, but even a few fake indignant reports on media management from the media would have been heartening for those of us in denial.Deebeenoreply@blogger.com