tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post9043410660951727496..comments2024-03-27T13:09:26.512+05:30Comments on E=mc^2: Key to Telangana: Article 3Sujaihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16539694685428659940noreply@blogger.comBlogger238125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-28090270703782144612014-02-01T12:31:31.460+05:302014-02-01T12:31:31.460+05:30hahahaha am dying laughing after going through di...hahahaha am dying laughing after going through dis comments........ even am announcing the date feb 15 telangana gonna come n get ready fo lamentation............ now the game starts Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-37638992141606389722013-10-09T14:24:16.035+05:302013-10-09T14:24:16.035+05:30Well articulated. That should be the basis. Well articulated. That should be the basis. Sujaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16539694685428659940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-2712988788268738462013-10-09T14:07:19.477+05:302013-10-09T14:07:19.477+05:30"The prerequisite for any unification is the ..."The prerequisite for any unification is the mutual consent of the people of all the regions , where as for the division the dissent of at least one of the region is more than enough" . I believe better sense prevails if we analyse the issue based on this basic moral and ethical principle.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16769815498305575815noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-2723673245978474822013-10-02T00:35:07.352+05:302013-10-02T00:35:07.352+05:30The article is utter crap.
There is no such a th...The article is utter crap. <br /><br />There is no such a thing called 'new state' and 'existing state' as discussed in the article. The author has to look at State Reorganization bills to understand how it is done. There are 3 legal cases cited in my articles. Take a look. <br /><br />When a state is divided into two - as is being done - the two new states are called 'successor states'. <br /><br />The successor states can name themselves anything they want. One is called Telangana; and the other could be called Andhra Pradesh or Seemandhra or Potti Sriramulu State or whatever. There is no mention of capital cities in the bills. The states can choose any city as their capital. CWC resolution clearly says Telangana will be formed with 10 districts - that is the key message. <br /><br />The convoluted logic of your article appeals only to Seemandhras. We find Samaikyandhras pretty ignorant - no disrespect. You could post such articles as comments on my blog, but please do not seek my opinion in future. It will be a waste of my time. Thanks. Sujaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16539694685428659940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-39884157234672559052013-10-01T20:53:11.052+05:302013-10-01T20:53:11.052+05:30Sujai,
Let me know your views on this blog
http://...Sujai,<br />Let me know your views on this blog<br />http://www.namastheamerica.com/?p=37142Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16188726278035758058noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-82833853181731048282013-09-23T12:26:14.886+05:302013-09-23T12:26:14.886+05:30The idea of formation of Telngana may be benefit f...The idea of formation of Telngana may be benefit for a negligble few who are thirst to conquer the state. But it will not in any way helpful for upliftment of down trodden sections. Instead of hurridly going for separation it will be better if a open debut may be conducted among educationalists, statesmen and economists neglecting the political opportunists on both sides, or to prefer peoples referandum. Even now if separate state is preferred it is noting but facing hardship because some more issues like Gorkhaland, Vidharba and Poorvanchal issues will be ready to tackle. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-63695880528129086282013-09-15T05:40:41.286+05:302013-09-15T05:40:41.286+05:30Know about TELANGANA<a href="http://updatedvideo.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/state-of-hope-telangana.html" rel="nofollow">Know about TELANGANA</a> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-9668190259186718122013-09-07T23:45:18.627+05:302013-09-07T23:45:18.627+05:30Article 3 helps in Telangana because:
1. Article 3...Article 3 helps in Telangana because:<br />1. Article 3 can be amended by the President only by passing it in parliament with simple majority.<br />2. Practice is different from theory which is accepted but practice runs on the lines of theory.<br />3. People including parties are divided on regional basis within their hearts, so even if the state is united, it will not be longer as state is divided but this time demand will come from seemandhra.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-10196617145343874382013-09-04T11:25:23.273+05:302013-09-04T11:25:23.273+05:30It is genuine report.A decision shall be taken on ...It is genuine report.A decision shall be taken on the basis of recommendations made by Justice Sri Krishna Commission.Division of the state is not the only solution for discrepancies pointed out.Remedies can be found for redressal of any type of grievances.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-86992525778220801132013-08-18T13:21:33.325+05:302013-08-18T13:21:33.325+05:30Gorkhaland Demand is 107 yrs now. During British t...Gorkhaland Demand is 107 yrs now. During British time people of hills willing to live their own aspiration as the history of Darjeeling is no where related to West Bengal. In independent India in in 1950 people of hills want the same , then 1986 violent agitation when 1200 people died. 2007 again people say we want seperate hill state? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-90300865167755177112013-07-31T17:17:29.569+05:302013-07-31T17:17:29.569+05:30తెలంగాణా ప్రజల దశాబ్దాల కల 'తెలంగాణా రాష్ట్రం&...తెలంగాణా ప్రజల దశాబ్దాల కల 'తెలంగాణా రాష్ట్రం' సాకారమయ్యే సమయం ఆసన్నమయ్యింది, తెలంగాణా ప్రజలకు ఇవే నా శుభాకాంక్షలు. కిరణ్ కుమార్ కేhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054084645595458895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-78331974143257997812011-01-18T03:15:33.280+05:302011-01-18T03:15:33.280+05:30తెలంగాణ ప్రజలు ఒట్లేయ్యని కెసిఆర్ అంటే మేకేందుకో గ...తెలంగాణ ప్రజలు ఒట్లేయ్యని కెసిఆర్ అంటే మేకేందుకో గంత భయం ? అదే ఓట్లేసి గెలిపించి ఉంటె మీకు కింద నుండి కార్చే వాడేమో, నిజాం ఎవడో, భీం ఎవలో నీకు దేల్వకపోతే మిగిలనోల్లకు గూడ దేల్వదనుకువటం 'ధేడ్ దిమాఖ్' అంటారుAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-14168366391620362952011-01-18T02:53:51.628+05:302011-01-18T02:53:51.628+05:30అదేకదా తమ్మీ అసలు ముచ్చట. ఈ రోజు మందికి నిజాం ఎవడో...అదేకదా తమ్మీ అసలు ముచ్చట. ఈ రోజు మందికి నిజాం ఎవడో భీమ ఎవడో తెలవదు. కెసిఆర్ సెప్పిండు అని ఇక్కడ అప్పసేప్తుండ్రు.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-74977413123782206252011-01-18T02:26:10.860+05:302011-01-18T02:26:10.860+05:30>>ఒకప్పుడు తెలంగాణ రాష్ట్రం ఉండిందంట. అది మళ...>>ఒకప్పుడు తెలంగాణ రాష్ట్రం ఉండిందంట. అది మళ్ళే కావల్నంత.<br /><br />తెలుగు ప్రజలందరూ కలసి ఉండాలని పొట్టి శ్రీ రాములు ప్రాణ త్యాగం చేసి , అతని త్యాగం తో ఏర్పడిన రాష్ట్రాన్ని విడదీయ వద్దు అని అన్నారు చూడు, అదే బాపతి ఇది కూడా , <br /><br />అయినా 1956 కు ముందు ఉన్న తెలంగాణా కావలి అన్నారు కాని, 1956 ముందు తెలంగాణా రాష్ట్రము ఉందని ఎవడన్నాడు భే.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-83586089042494678692011-01-18T00:07:06.072+05:302011-01-18T00:07:06.072+05:30ఏమ్జేస్తము తమ్మి. చిలక మాదిరి నేనేదంటే నువ్వు గదేం...ఏమ్జేస్తము తమ్మి. చిలక మాదిరి నేనేదంటే నువ్వు గదేంతవు. మీ పెద్దలు ఏమి జేసున్డ్రో నీకు ఎరిఅక లేదు.<br />మరి ఇప్పుడెల్లి కెసిఆర్ సేప్పినది ఇక్కడ సేపుతున్నవు.<br />నీకో ముచ్చట చెప్పేదా? ఈ మారు ఉద్యమంల శానా సదువుకున్నోల్లు ఉన్నర్రు.<br />మరి ఈ ఇంటర్నేట్ల గూడ శానా రాస్తుండ్రు. కాని అల్లందరూ ఏమంతరో ఎరికనా?<br />ఒకప్పుడు తెలంగాణ రాష్ట్రం ఉండిందంట. అది మళ్ళే కావల్నంత.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-44739596143638129122011-01-17T23:56:08.991+05:302011-01-17T23:56:08.991+05:30Sujai,
It is agreed that SA were a little ahead i...Sujai,<br /><br />It is agreed that SA were a little ahead in politics at that time compared to Telangana people.<br />But that does not grant benefit of innocence and ignorance to Telangana.<br /><br />Did Telangana leaders or people or public figures play any role in Vishalandhra or not? If so what role? When did they express unwillingness towards Vishalandhra?<br />Was Vishalandhra dream a conspiracy to capture Hyderabad?<br /><br />This is what I could put together from happenings before merger.<br /><br />Nizam Andhra Mahasabha helped establish links between two regions. After liberation there was clamoring for Vishalandhra to unite Telugus. The Vishalandhra mahasabha held in 1949.<br />Two points to note at that time were Madras and Sribagh agreement. Telugus in general were still looking to retain Madras as capital and Sribagh agreement shows having capital of future Andhra to be in Rayalaseema. <br />Vishalandhra was still a dream only as neither Andhra state was formed by then. Nor any proposal to divide Hyderabad state.<br />At this stage what is the response of Telangana leaders to Vishalandhra? Were they in favor, against or undecided onlookers?<br />One can argue that Telangana leaders participating Vishalandhra are not necessarily representing Telanganas. Agreed.<br />Nevertheless same people later headed Hyderabad PCC also part of elected government in 1952.<br />There was 'idli-sambar baghao' movement in 1952. There were doubts in Telangana minds, specifically educated, about relations with SA.<br />Even at this juncture Vishalandhra was not really for Hyderabad. Telangana leaders have enough opportunity to express their unwillingness to join Vishalandhra.<br />But they did opposite. During 1953 Andhra state bill 3 MPs from Telangana demanded immediate formation of Vishalandhra with Hyderabad as capital. For the first time ever a proposal of Vishalandhra with Hyderabad as capital.<br />There were no opposition to such call from Telangana political establishment.<br /><br />The demand for retaining Telangana as separate unit has started only after division Hyderabad has become inevitable.<br />Even at this point there was no organized opposition to merger. Yes! people raised their concerns with SRC.<br />But political establishment was divided but both sections were elected by Telangana. In such situation how should one view it?<br />Glass half-empty or half-full?<br /><br />Actions of BRK who was most of the time in favor Vishalandhra certainly need explanation.<br />Today a few T-vaadis cannot dismiss him just like that. Conversely SA too can dismiss actions of few greedy politicians and call for fresh start.<br /><br />You cannot escape the blame, though partial, for merger and project yourself as a victim.<br />"tila papam tala pidikedu". <br />Best way forward is stop projected one-sided clap, own up the role of Telangans all along and work towards an amicable settlement.<br />I cannot help but quote Nehru quoted by SKC. Win-win is always good. <br /><br /><br />Well! Do not bounce with "what about post-1953 events was it not conspiracy to capture Hyderabad?"<br />No and Yes. Exactly like Dec 9 2009 announcement. SAs believed (may be assumed) Telanganas in general not against merger. So they pursued merger.<br />It does not matter Hyderabad being amidst scheme of things is incidental or intentional.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-81055899151602540842011-01-17T21:12:34.935+05:302011-01-17T21:12:34.935+05:30You are suggestiong that in 1956 Telangana was pol...<i>You are suggestiong that in 1956 Telangana was politically backward too. It could not take important decisions on its own.<br />You have not answered my question 1953 debate in parliament. Actually speech by Sri. M. R. Krishna (Karimnagar) was mockery of situation in Andhras.<br />Democracy in Andhra state was no great by 1955. They too were 7 year old independent democracy. Moreover ridden with caste conflicts.<br />But you people do not hesitate to draw conspiracy theories.</i><br /><br />You need to read history. And then you need to understand it.<br /><br />By the time Telangana was liberated from a monarch, Andhras had already participated in many elections, had political parties, ministers held office in a democratically elected government (under British). <br /><br />Yes, Andhras were politically empowered. And their representatives were elected by the people after having seen elections for nearly 20 to 30 years. <br /><br />Telangana under Nizam did not have political representation.Sujaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16539694685428659940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-68670251544987824312011-01-17T20:05:13.598+05:302011-01-17T20:05:13.598+05:30>>..I have to believe. Since Marri Channared...>>..I have to believe. Since Marri Channareddy said "no need for Telangana" and no-one objected to it.<br /><br />same way, when all partis supported telangan formation in assembly elections, no one objected that from Seemandra side. <br /><br />>>.You want explicit slogans?<br />Yes. You are talking like Bush, like if any nation is not with USA in fighting Al-khida that means they are with Al-khida.<br /><br />>>But any person with slightest deviation from your view-point is a Telangana drohi for you.<br /><br />Same way any person with slightest deviation from your view-point is anti-national or Terrorists. <br /><br />>>Whereas Telangana greats sharing the same dias and uttering not words are worse than Mullahs of Taliban.<br /><br />Yet, you love to stay with them, what a fool. <br /><br />>>Per Indian law KCR, Jeevanreddy, Madhu Yaskhi must be behind bars and barred from public appearances.<br /><br />That means the law is not working. Keep dreaming. By saying telagnan@ anti-nationls, Lagadapati, Kavuri, TG etc etc should also be behind bars.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-76888622745116616502011-01-17T19:58:23.034+05:302011-01-17T19:58:23.034+05:30>>Your Telangana KCR, has a streak of Vijaya...>>Your Telangana KCR, has a streak of Vijayanagaram stock in him.<br /><br />Can you prove it?<br /><br />>>They hardly stopped anybody demanding separate Andhra.<br /><br />Excepect those who's a** kicked in Guntur. <br /><br />>>Andhra but they do not abuse Telanganas like KCR, Jeevanreddy, Madhu Yaskhi, Pidamarti ravi.<br /><br />There are few in Telangan who support United,but they dont abuse telangana agitators like how Lagadapati, TG, Kavuri did (taliban, anti-national, drunkers, naxals)<br /><br />>>ఓకే మాటమీద నిలకడ ఉండాలే. గయ్యాళి పెళ్ళాం లెక్క మబ్బులో ఓ మాట సెప్పి మంచం గాడ వేరే ముచ్చట తెస్తే ఎలాగును బిడ్డా!<br /><br />ఒకే మాట మీద ఉన్నది మా తెలంగానోల్లె గాదె? తెలంగాణా వద్దని మర్రి నీ చెవిలో జెప్పిండా? ఒక పారి కలిసుందామని, మరొక పారి విడి పోదామని, మల్లి కసున్దామని జెప్పేది మీరు గాదె?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-3225985360363971852011-01-17T01:45:22.348+05:302011-01-17T01:45:22.348+05:30Calling OU students as Talibans,
Yes! Pidamarti r...<i>Calling OU students as Talibans, </i><br />Yes! Pidamarti ravi who threatened to stop Andhras returning from Sankranti is innocent follower.<br />Whereas Telangana greats sharing the same dias and uttering not words are worse than Mullahs of Taliban.<br />Per Indian law KCR, Jeevanreddy, Madhu Yaskhi must be behind bars and barred from public appearances.<br />But spineless governments could do nothing as the whole blunder was started by it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-64452476611137312302011-01-17T01:40:40.097+05:302011-01-17T01:40:40.097+05:30atleast I am brave enough to name myself with an i...<i>atleast I am brave enough to name myself with an identity in cyber space.. Not like a Anonymous coward. </i><br />A person with Simpson's profile and alias but no person details is no different from Anonymous.<br />OK for you sake I will take 'erra bottu'. Will that make me brave like you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-43943890783043491642011-01-17T01:37:07.593+05:302011-01-17T01:37:07.593+05:30You reject Burgula letter because it is not signed...<i>You reject Burgula letter because it is not signed, but you want me to believe the article wrote by some nobody. </i><br />That is exactly the funny thing about T-vaadis. They think it is easy to fools other with a piece of paper. But they end up lowering standards of Telangana wisdom.<br />The so called letter has no names in 'from' or at 'yours sincerely'. Person, sharing BRKs surname, who brought it out even chose to cut one page.<br />Only thing authentic about this letter is the old paper and typed on a old-style typewriter.<br />The article I posted was by yet another 'karudugattina' T-vaadi. I hoped you will pay attention to it.<br />But any person with slightest deviation from your view-point is a Telangana drohi for you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-43488418324086113512011-01-17T01:12:41.147+05:302011-01-17T01:12:41.147+05:30For the same reason why Andhra people didnt take i...<i>For the same reason why Andhra people didnt take it in 1969.</i><br />I have already said "avunante kaadanile kaadante avunanile...". There is one old story of 'gayyali brahmin housewife' chandika. It fits well Telangana leaders.<br /><br /><i>Do you think in 1972, telangana people loved to be in AP?</i><br />I have to believe. Since Marri Channareddy said "no need for Telangana" and no-one objected to it.<br /><br /><i>Is there any united andhra movement in 1972 times in Telangana? Looks like you lost in your argument. </i><br />You want explicit slogans? How to interpret refusal to division? I lost argument? I don't mind you extending your stay in fools paradise.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-53540965430027218572011-01-17T01:12:09.712+05:302011-01-17T01:12:09.712+05:30if Marri Chenna Reddy left the agitation, does it ...<i>if Marri Chenna Reddy left the agitation, does it mean all the people too?</i><br />But Marri made difference and Telangana movement was history till 1998. Nobody really carried out any significant movement until KCR lost his job.<br /><br /><i>If Botsa is okey with separation, does it mean all his people support it? </i><br />Assumptions! Foolish assumptions. Not only Botsa but many public figures from other support separation. Seemaandhra people know democracy. They hardly stopped anybody demanding separate Andhra.<br />Of course they have shown even better sense by stopping fanatics like Vasant Nageswara rao when he tried to stoke hatred.<br />There are plenty of people demanding separate Andhra but they do not abuse Telanganas like KCR, Jeevanreddy, Madhu Yaskhi, Pidamarti ravi.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-35736980728973671602011-01-17T00:58:15.644+05:302011-01-17T00:58:15.644+05:30ఏమి సేయ్యాలే బిడ్డా! తెలంగాణ బిడ్డలు మాటి మాటికి ల...ఏమి సేయ్యాలే బిడ్డా! తెలంగాణ బిడ్డలు మాటి మాటికి లొల్లి పెడన్తోంటే ఆల్లకు కోపమోచ్చుండే. మరి తెలంగాణా నాయకులు మచి కతలు చెప్పి అపినీరు. మర్రి నాయన ఏమన్నడు? ఇక తెలంగాణ ముచ్చట అక్కర్నేలేదన్నాడు. అందరమూ ఒక్క లెక్క ఉందాము అన్నాడు. అరి మంచి చెప్పిండు కదా అని అన్ద్రోల్లు నమ్మినారు. <br />మరి పాతికేళ్ళకెళ్ళి సప్పుడు చేయనోల్లు. మళ్లే మాది మాగ్గావాలంటే ఏమి సేయ్యాలే బిడ్డా!<br />గిదేమన్న సిన్న పోరీల బొమ్మలాటనా? <br />ఓకే మాటమీద నిలకడ ఉండాలే. గయ్యాళి పెళ్ళాం లెక్క మబ్బులో ఓ మాట సెప్పి మంచం గాడ వేరే ముచ్చట తెస్తే ఎలాగును బిడ్డా!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com