tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post2751723082190022166..comments2024-03-27T13:09:26.512+05:30Comments on E=mc^2: Telangana in Movies, Is it a Dialect, Accent or Slang?Sujaihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16539694685428659940noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-69754245771331418342020-02-21T17:41:30.707+05:302020-02-21T17:41:30.707+05:30very nice article...very nice article<a href="https://best-hindishayari.in/zindagi-shayari/" rel="nofollow">.</a>..himansu nayakhttps://best-hindishayari.in/zindagi-shayarinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-58353315226197825622018-10-04T22:50:12.658+05:302018-10-04T22:50:12.658+05:30I didn't divert the topic, read my points agai...I didn't divert the topic, read my points again. Its a reply in a nice wayKA Kumarnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-78689502500122257332017-12-03T22:38:04.593+05:302017-12-03T22:38:04.593+05:30Sujai,
I agree that the formation of the Telangan...Sujai,<br /><br />I agree that the formation of the Telangana state and the later mainstreaming of Telangana dialect is a good thing. It is emboldening directors to use it in their films (and certainly making the content fresh). People who grew up with Andhra sensibilities may not come to terms immediately with such content, but they will do so eventually. So far so good. But, there are so many things in Arjun Reddy that made me cringe. In fact, so much that the fact that it is now considered a "Telangana film" really concerns me. What about all its misogyny, artlessness, hero centrism? It's just a movie and it has its own nods to what I believe is the worst in Telangana culture today. At what time does all this love for Telangana culture become fatuous grandstanding? At what time do we start countenancing deplorable stuff just because there is a bit of Telangana in it?<br /><br />Best,<br />JaredJared Diamondhttp://jareddiamond.orgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-30976176764227450082017-11-28T20:56:30.359+05:302017-11-28T20:56:30.359+05:30KA Kumar, you're the one who have diverted the...KA Kumar, you're the one who have diverted the entire topic. Read Sujai's blog again.Praveen Reddy Jhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15287482322211301868noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-90627979023283846582017-09-29T18:35:50.400+05:302017-09-29T18:35:50.400+05:30I disagree your comment on Arjun Reddy. First of a...I disagree your comment on Arjun Reddy. First of all that movie was lapped up by all Telugu audiences across regions and criticism was there by all (ex: VH in TS from congress started it on posters issue. Also some websites wrote comments on misogyny in movie by Telugu and non-telugu speakers also). Dont bring regional bias into it. If movie is good people will watch appreciate across regions. Fidaa and Amitumi are made by non-telanagana directors. Dasari made osey ramulamma movie which was hit before TS formation. TS formation is a political decision nothing to do with Art. Its just that film makers from TS didn't make it big. Now we have good movie directors from TS also (even before state formation, it takes time). How come Ramgopal varma from andhra make Hindi movies and was successfull?<br /><br />I found it objectionable when you suggest "You could continue watching your hip-gyrating, double entendres". Who are you say that your movies?. Did the anchors say they like such movies? Is Vulgarity only in Telugu but not in other movies? Limit your point to Arjun Reddy movie saying its ok to use cuss words, understand the intention not literal meaning. Please dont divert from topic. Your argument is bordering on parochialism and misogynyKA Kumarnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-15318931027864963242017-09-28T23:27:08.808+05:302017-09-28T23:27:08.808+05:30Sujai, I have gone thru your blog complete and wan...Sujai, I have gone thru your blog complete and want to comment on Telangana identity. First Identity is something which is based on positivity (and not negativity) based on Language, culture, history etc..My 1st identity is Indian whether china is rich or strong or pakistan is poor and 2nd Identity is Telugu irrespective if Tamil is rich or poor. When Telangana got merged with Andhra the basis was shared history (before 1800), Language and culture, Not that there is no diversity within Telugu. The gentlemen agreement was based on economic and social reasons that telangana is less developed in nizam rule compared to british ruled andhra. Identity was not a point raised by majority. Please dont lie saying even 1969 agitation is about identity, its about political reasons and state govt jobs. Infact many TS intellectuals critised 1969 agitation as feudal. Do refer to news items from 1969-72 for knowing complete information. IF we tell a lie 100 times it doesn't become truth<br /><br />If people of telangana are talking about indentity then there shouldn't be agreement at place in 1956 as the assumption of agreement is shared identity. They should have told then only that they have different identity. Telugu(andhra) people did form a agreement to unite with marathi or oriya as they have different identity. Andhra separation from Madras is based on Language (i.e. identity), its not economic. <br />Your identity if based on culture and strength of others becomes negativity. ex: Pakistan was created based on Muslim identity as they got negativity because british rule ended the mughal colonial rule (Just drawing a anology not comparing both are same). By 2010 based on statistics it became evendent that TS is not backward not only economically but even culturally, socially so that started this Identity. There is no consistency in their arguments. Telangana identity is not based on strength of Andhra. Again if change your argument and say we are economically backward, it has been proved your not in 2010. KCR himself said we are 2nd richest state after formation (due large revenue coming from HYD. Dont compare HYD of 1956 with that of 2010). Thats why many have said division of AP or formation of TS is un-scientificAnil Knoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-60975670191910478422017-09-28T16:13:26.940+05:302017-09-28T16:13:26.940+05:30You are partially right and partially wrong here. ...You are partially right and partially wrong here. Telangana is a region not a language or dialect. Yes slang and dialect are different. Telugu is a language and it has many dialects, infact in telangana itself has many dialects but slang is a way we pronounce. and dialect is a version of language.Person from Adilabad slang is different from Khammam. Whatever words you mention like Thokku are used in other regions also. same with word uruku (for run) but may not be in daily conversation. Main difference betwen Telugu in Telangana and other regions is the usage of urdu words which are more in Telangana and less in other parts (infact Andhra region also has some urdu words like Asalu, Sisalu, Khaidi etc as it was ruled same nizams before british came which many in telangana and andhra are ignorant). If people in telangana are afraid to speak their slang till now, its their problem you can't blame other for it. No one is forcing anyone to speak in a way but nothing wrong in letting grammitical corrections (Do you say Bookku in office for book or you say book?)<br /><br />PS : Hindi is not a language (like Telugu, Tamil, Marathi). It is derived from AL-hind which is a persian arabic word and Khariboli is a languauge spoken around delhi which is standardized as Hindi. Haryanvi and Bhojpuri are languages not dialetects or slangs of hindi. all these Awadhi, bhojpuri, haryani are closely related of a language groupAnilnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21825668.post-46744981119026579912017-09-24T20:47:32.868+05:302017-09-24T20:47:32.868+05:30As always, another logical post Sujay. Even if it&...As always, another logical post Sujay. Even if it's a slang or a different accent, nothing wrong with it. It's just different. What matters is the intent behind words. People who say their language is "pure" are ignorant as if they look back, it would have been a variant of another language or quite different than what it was at that time. But people like you come up with a logical way of explaining things. For the rest of us, though their comments are offensive, we just try to ignore the ignorant.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com