The concepts of
human rights, human dignity, self-rule and self-determination are quite modern. Such concepts did not exist in the ancient
world. Even if we were to find a glimpse of these concepts discussed in
philosophies and texts of the ancients, we do not necessarily see its
implementation as a comprehensive and extended practice to actually alter the
lives of the people.
For thousands of
years, man was born as a slave or subject and died as one. Most of these slaves and subjects, sometimes
even the landlords, did not possess any rights.
And the worst part is- most of them did not even realize that they
possessed certain rights that are not necessarily ordained by their monarch.
Their assets,
their property, their worth, their produce and even their self-respect, was up
for grabs by their landlord, their king or an invading king or a marauding
dacoit. Security was an expensive commodity.
The monarch provided meager security that was not even assured, and in
return usurped all their rights.
It took many
centuries of struggle in certain parts of the world to come to a realization that
man had certain ‘inalienable’ rights, which even the most powerful monarch
could not take those away from him.
Starting with Magna
Carta of 1215 in England, which
established that the law was above the king, through the Declaration of Independence of 1776 in America, which observed that all
men are created equal, we got the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 in UN, which officially recognized
the human rights as inviolable concept and gave people of mankind a right for
self-determination.
The modern
concept of free men coming together in social contract to form a government,
empowering it with powerful institutions to govern them in return, is one of
the greatest achievements of mankind that came about after millions of years of
evolution. In this framework, the
rights are not granted by the state to the common men – they already have these
rights which even the government cannot violate. These common men decide which powers they
want to give to their government depending on how judiciously that government
uses them.
India inherited
these modern concepts and modern institutions without going through the phases of
actually struggling for it. British
colonialism had its unintended consequences- its colonies demanded the same
treatment as English subjects who took pride in possessing certain rights as free
men. And through their struggles of
fighting colonialism, some of the colonies inherited the modern institutions of
their masters.
It is important
to appreciate the roots of these modern concepts because without that appreciation
the state stands poised to usurp the rights of free men with impunity and the citizens do not
even know that they are being oppressed.
Thomas Jefferson observed:
Every
government degenerates when trusted to the rulers alone. The people themselves therefore are its only
safe depositories. And to render even
them safe, their minds must be improved.
In the name of
nationalism, in the name of patriotism, in the name of sacrificing a region to
uphold the integration of the union, in the name of law and order, our nation
has been suppressing the democratic, legitimate and innocuous aspirations of
Telangana people for far too long.
It is unfortunate
that New Delhi has been toying with the people of this region, resorting to
subterfuge, prevarication, duplicity, and hypocrisy. While New Delhi keeps repeating that Andhra
Pradesh has to decide the fate of Telangana, Hyderabad keeps repeating that the
Central Government has to take a decision.
In the whole process of tossing the ball across the court, Telangana is taken
for a ride where its youth commits suicide on a daily basis.
In no democracy
on the planet would the legislators continue to serve even after submitting
their resignations twice. The fact that
a resigning legislator is not allowed to relinquish his or her duty is
tantamount to bonded labor and slavery.
That a democracy would not pay heed to such resignations and go about
its job as if nothing has happened shows how low our democracy has descended.
To understand the
roots of modern democracy, let’s refer to the Declaration
of Independence of American Colonies which was ratified on 4 July
1776. It is a very interesting and profound
document. The statement: ‘We hold these
truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal…’ is considered one
of the most famous sentences in English language. Authored by Thomas Jefferson with inputs from
Benjamin Franklin and John Adams, this document gained global reputation
because it sets tone for emancipation of man from being a subject of a king to
become a citizen with the responsibility of creating his/her own government.
Since New Delhi
has decided to absolve itself of any responsibility to carve out the state of
Telangana it is time we take this symbol step of declaring the state of
Telangana as the wishes of 350 lakh Telangana people.
[The following
text is inspired from ‘Declaration of Independence’ of US Colonies of
1776. Most of the original text is deliberately
used verbatim to highlight how common their cause was with that of current
Telangana. Only the relevant texts that
are applicable to the case of Telangana are changed from the original declaration.]
IN HYDERABAD, November 1, 2011
The unanimous Declaration of the State of Telangana
When in the
Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the
political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the
powers of the earth, the separate and equal status to which the Laws of Nature
and of Nature entitles them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind
requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the
separation.
We hold these
truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are
endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
That to secure
these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers
from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes
destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish
it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles
and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to
effect their Safety and Happiness.
Prudence, indeed,
will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light
and transient causes; and accordingly all experience has shown, that mankind
are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right
themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
But when a long
train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a
design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their
duty, to throw off such a political setup, and to provide new Guards for their
future security.
Such has been the
patient sufferance of this region; and such is now the necessity which
constrains them to alter their current setup of Government. The history of the
present Government of Andhra Pradesh is a history of repeated injuries and
usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute
Tyranny over this Region. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid
world.
- It has reneged on the promises made in the Gentlemen’s Agreement of 1956, nullifying one clause after another eventually leading to complete negation of the Agreement by 1969.
- It has passed laws to dilute Mulki Rules to help Andhra people to come and take jobs that were safeguarded for people of Telangana.
- It has brutally suppressed a people’s agitations in 1969 resulting in death of 370 Telangana people and injuring thousands.
- It has broken the promises made in the Six-point Formula.
- It has discriminated against people of Telangana in jobs, in opportunities, and in education.
- It has denied due share of river waters to Telangana.
- It has plundered our natural resources reducing the region as an internal colony to supply raw materials.
- It has suppressed the political aspirations of the people of region reducing them to second-class citizens.
- It has dissolved Legislative House repeatedly, thereby depriving the people of Telangana democratic forum, whenever the cause of Telangana was embraced by its political leaders seeking justice to the region.
- It has allowed for overturning the Supreme Court decisions which were in favour of Telangana people.
- It has obstructed passage of laws that sought to address the pains and travails of Telangana people.
- It has sought to obliterate Telangana identity by disseminating false notions to young schoolchildren, and avoiding all references to history of Telangana in school and college education.
- It has arrested its leadership with impunity without warrants and imprisoned thousands of its youth without any legal recourse.
- It has combined with leaders of Andhra and Rayalaseema to subject people of Telangana to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving its Assent to their Acts:
For toppling the first Chief Minister hailing
from Telangana region;
For toppling the Governments headed by Chief
Ministers from Telangana whenever Telangana tried to assert its rights;
For suspending our own Legislatures, and
declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases
whatsoever.
In every stage of
these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our
repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Government
whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit
to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been
wanting in attentions to our Andhra brethren.
- We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their State legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us.
- We have reminded them of the circumstances of our plight and conditions in the United State of Andhra Pradesh.
- We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence.
They too have
been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore,
acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as
we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in Struggle, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore,
the Representatives of the Telangana, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge
of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by
Authority of the good People of Telangana, solemnly publish and declare,
That Telangana is,
and of Right ought to be Free and Separate State in Republic of India; that it is Absolved from all
Allegiance to the Seemandhra Government, and that all political connection
between them and the State of Andhra Pradesh, is and ought to be totally
dissolved; and that as Free and Separate State, they have full Power to do all
Acts and Things which Separate States may of right do.
And for the
support of this Declaration, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our
Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
Sujai, this is great. I second the motion and commend all Telangana people to suport this resolution. I hope the people's representatives as well as opinion leaders across all ssections of Telangana will assemble and formally adopt this resolution.
ReplyDeleteThe delusions are crossing all the limits. See how many in Hyderabad will support this trash. We in Hyderabad do NOT want to be part of Telangana state, if it ever exists. Any attempts to forcibly merge us into Telangana will be dealt with same force that current 'movement' is taking.
ReplyDeleteWe have all the democratic right to elect our leaders and we, the people, have failed to elect good leaders. We, the people, voted not for the BEST candidate but voted for one who gave us more money before elections, who is from our caste and religion. We, the people, voted for leader who promised free stuff and who hurled abuses and lies at others to cover up his incompetence. We avoided voting most of the times and even when we voted, we did not care if our elected representative is solving our problems. We, the people, stood by and cheered him when he showed passion in resigning repeatedly but not resigning when no funds were allotted or no problems were solved in his constituency. We, the people, elected people who cared damn about the development but know how to blame others for it.
‘We hold the following truths to be self-evident’.
ReplyDelete1. All parts of AndhraPradesh except Hyderabad were equally neglected.
2. All accents of AP are equally ridiculed.
3. Indian Central Govt concentrates only on the development of the Capital cities.
4. Democracy is like business and any decisions are done only if that decision helps his party to be in power.
5. It is the responsibility of the political representative of every constituency to make sure his people are not cheated.
6. All the politicians of AP cheated their people and will continue to cheat even after the state will be broken down into 100 pieces.
7. There is no capable leader in Telengana.
8. It is easy to write great sounding documents
It is time to declare our intent clearly to the rest of India. That it is not a political puppet show. That it is the sincere yearning of the people of Telangana to have their own state. Here it is for self-determination and being the masters of our own destiny!
ReplyDeleteJai Telangana!
Prashanth
Good effort...Reflects the emotions of the people....but misses on the logical aspects.
ReplyDeleteThe declaration says
"...The history of the present Government of Andhra Pradesh is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over this Region. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
It has reneged on the promises made in the Gentlemen’s Agreement of 1956, nullifying one clause after another eventually leading to complete negation of the Agreement by 1969. It has passed laws to dilute Mulki Rules to help Andhra people to come and take jobs that were safeguarded for people of Telangana. It has brutally suppressed a people’s agitations in 1969 resulting in death of 370 Telangana people and injuring thousands.... "
The "It" used above refers to the present Goverment of Andhra Pradesh as stated in the first sentence quoted above.
How is that the present Government of Andhra Pradesh is responsible for the actions of the State Government in 1956 or 1969 ?
Subsequently the declaration even blames the present Government of Andhra Pradesh, which is came to existence after the 2009 elections, that it has toppled the previous Governments headed by Chief Ministers from Telangana.
I think Sujai meant Andhra and Rayalaseema politicians and not the "present Government of Andhra Pradesh".
I suggest that one of us (the readers of the blog) should volunteer to improve the declaration.
Good effort...Reflects the emotions of the people....but misses on the logical aspects.
ReplyDeleteThe declaration says
"...The history of the present Government of Andhra Pradesh is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over this Region. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
It has reneged on the promises made in the Gentlemen’s Agreement of 1956, nullifying one clause after another eventually leading to complete negation of the Agreement by 1969. It has passed laws to dilute Mulki Rules to help Andhra people to come and take jobs that were safeguarded for people of Telangana. It has brutally suppressed a people’s agitations in 1969 resulting in death of 370 Telangana people and injuring thousands.... "
The "It" used above refers to the present Goverment of Andhra Pradesh as stated in the first sentence quoted above.
How is that the present Government of Andhra Pradesh is responsible for the actions of the State Government in 1956 or 1969 ?
Subsequently the declaration even blames the present Government of Andhra Pradesh, which is came to existence after the 2009 elections, that it has toppled the previous Governments headed by Chief Ministers from Telangana.
I think Sujai meant Andhra and Rayalaseema politicians and not the "present Government of Andhra Pradesh".
I suggest that one of us (the readers of the blog) should volunteer to improve the declaration.
Maheshwar Reddy:
ReplyDeleteHow is that the present Government of Andhra Pradesh is responsible for the actions of the State Government in 1956 or 1969 ?
I used the 'Government of Andhra Pradesh' in the sense one uses British Government, British Rule, British Kingdom, British Crown, or British Empire.
When we use that, we do not necessarily ask which viceroy was governing India, or if which King or Queen was ruling British Empire then, or if which Prime Minister in England was in power.
We use these terms and words collectively though the people in charge, or in power, may have been changing.
Hope that makes sense.
But the govt of AP always included 100+ reps from 'Telangana' region.
ReplyDeleteNobody suppressed you. There was no tyranny. You had a right to vote just the same as the rest of the state.
ReplyDeleteLooks like you guys are a tad out of touch with reality. This is a democratic country. How come telangana people did not vote in more telangana CMs in all these years?
Are you suggesting that there has been election fraud? Doesnt look like you are. These rants are becoming increasingly childish.
Please see http://edisatyam.blogspot.com/2011/11/1.html for an excellent satire on how the unemployed politicians conspired to form Andhra state in 1953
ReplyDeleteSujai,
ReplyDeletePlease read this - http://www.jstor.org/pss/2193757
Can you also write about the forced occupation of Hyderabad state by police action?
Why Hyd was split in to three states with out going through a referendum?
Also, why Telangana CM was black mailed by Indian govt to merge in to Andhra.
I am afraid there are a lot of unanswered questions why India had to be ruthless and kill more than 50000 people to occupy Hyd.
Remember India promised autonomy to Hyd in 1948 but Nizam wanted it to be a separate country. Why India never gave us this autonomy?
Why United Nations failed miserably to protect the people of hyderabad?
Doesnt India still owe us a referendum? If Indians are peace loving people then they should let us choose our fate.
Why no body talks about this?
-Raj
The delusions are crossing all the limits. See how many in Hyderabad will support this trash. We in Hyderabad do NOT want to be part of Telangana state, if it ever exists. Any attempts to forcibly merge us into Telangana will be dealt with same force that current 'movement' is taking.
ReplyDeleteNo it shall be dealt with more force from the native Hyderabadis. We either want the old state of Hyderabad to be reinstated or we want a separate state like in Option 4. We do not want to be part of Telangana.
TELENGANA,
ReplyDeleteTELENGANA was part of the then NIZAM STATE OF HYDERABAD.The city of Hyderabad was cosmopolitan city with five major languages (Urdu,Telugu, Kannada,Marathi, English), also some foreign,languages,like Persian.Arabic,french etc were spoken,written. Three regions that is TELENGANA,KARNATAKA,MAHARASHTRA.
lived together,never fought among them selves.even though other nationals,but no fight among themselves.many decades all the people lived peace fully.
After merging with RayalaSeema,
Coastal regions. the first time TELUGU speaking are fighting.hating with same language
why? Must be some reason? specially the Andhras think they are highly intelligent.arrogant
the same reason they separated from MADRAS province NOW Chennai.the chennai city has 90%population was and is TELUGUS.
right from 1952 they think they are the people who liberated the state from Nizam's rule.the same concept is not with other regions
Maharashtra,Karnataka.
this is enough to prove the behavior of the people from seem & coastal.As a matter of fact we have since mote than 100 years the Andhras are with us in project Nizamsagar.more over the industrilists like Birla's TATA's many MArwari's,Sindhis etc are settled, invested millions of ruppes.big factories are in the state. theytare not bothered. few persons who invested few lacks cry foul.these people acquired,illegal lands, they think the lands will be taken by TeleNGana.it is mere imagination.more over many times many agreements are made between two regions.broke them urgently.GETLEMENS agreement,MULKI rule,presidents order, many GO's which are never implemented.pretend they are implementing for few days,then forget.more over in the assembly the numbers game they are more nos. if the state has to with out presidents rule, if united andhra only.on the formation from first time from Madras, with in days the presidents rule was implemented.more over the financially it was in dole drums.the TElengana is having
surplus money more than 100crores. now it is more.to day they are talking about manners,the way thy wrote against TAMILIANS u can see in papers.like ANDHRAPRABHA etc,.
It seems you feel that human rights and dignity exist only for telangana people.Otherwise how could you possibly put forward various reasons to support hooliganism that eventually led to the statue demolition on tank bund.Initially you said that statue demolition was first done by andhras..you forgot no statue that represented the culture and dignity was demolished any where except on tank bund.
ReplyDeleteThen you got5 another brilliant idea and wondered whether the anger of the crowd was not against the statues or the persons the statues represent but against those who were responsible for erecting them!
I think similar argument could be used to support 1)babri masjid demolition 2)WTC incident 3)bamiyan budha statue demolition.and all heinous crimes committed on this earth.
You strain your brain to come up with a woman repeatedly raped argument.Where are you living sujai?If at all telangana is like the woman the blame squarely lies on the people of telangana who elected their own representatives all these days.Do not blame out side agencies for your deficiencies.
A sane and rational person like sujai becomes completely irrational when he starts thinking about telangana.What a pity!
sujai !
ReplyDeleteAre the human rights and dignity only applicable to certain people? No rights ,no dignity to the statues demolished on tank bund?
First you started supporting the demolition by coming up with the argument that it was andhras who de3molish statues.But no statue that represented culture and dignity was treated this way any where.
Then you came up with another brilliant argument.You wondered whether the anger of the mob was more directed towards those responsible for erecting them!
Don't you think similar arguments could be made with reference to 1)babri masjid 2)WTC 3)bamiyan budha statues and many more heinous crimes?
A sane and rational person like sujai suddenly becomes irrational whenever telangana is mentioned.What a pity!
I completely agree with SERA....
ReplyDeleteSujai,Your clarification on the "present Government" helped.
ReplyDeleteLooking forward for your comments on Prime Minister's statement and Parakala Prabhakar incident.
rachanalu:
ReplyDeleteAre the human rights and dignity only applicable to certain people? No rights ,no dignity to the statues demolished on tank bund?
Yes.
There are no ‘rights’ to the statues demolished on the tank bund. Statues are not human and therefore do not enjoy the rights as humans. Private property gets protection because it is attached to the humans as ‘possession’ – once again comes as rights of citizens. Public property lies with the state and there are laws to protect public property. But I am not aware of any rights enjoyed by statues.
What about dignity?
ReplyDelete