In the
history of mankind, many kings and government officials have made some mega
blunders while carving out nations and states.
They resorted to ‘creative’ experiments, guided sometimes by greed,
sometimes by pride, sometimes by ignorance, and sometimes by a naïve desire to satisfy
all stakeholders. While creativity in
experimentation is usually considered an essential attribute in science or
arts, it has never yielded good results when it came to the serious and grave
matters of geopolitical solutions.
Invariably most such ‘creative’ experiments resulted in huge upheavals
for the people, and led to conflicts, violent revolutions, mass movements,
assassinations, coups, instability and warfare. The issues that originated during
redrawing of boundaries festered on for decades and some for centuries. Almost always, the key decision makers who carved
out nations and states were obsessed with some unrealistic idea which they
refused to let go even when prevailing wisdom suggested otherwise.
Going
against all conventional wisdom, the British tried to manage two nations for Palestine
and Jews in the same land in 1948 and thereby ended up creating one of the
most troubled places on the planet. In
another episode, Pakistan was created out of two disjoint regions, with
different languages and cultures, separated by thousands kilometers of India in
between. The experiment never stood a
chance. Eventually, the eastern region
of Bengali-speaking Bangladesh got separated, but only after genocide of half a
million people and exodus of nearly ten million people, followed by full-blown
war of 1971 between West Pakistan and India.
Often we
fail to learn from history. But if there
is one lesson to learn, that is - in matters of carving of nations or states,
the best formula has been to keep it simple and clean. Leaving something unattended, or trying to
create a hodgepodge solution, or trying to make some interim arrangements, has
most often led to serious conflicts and only exacerbated the problem. Those small wounds left unattended
eventually consumed the whole body.
Shared Capital Experiment - Berlin
At the end
of World War II, Russian and Allied forces captured Germany, but soon an iron
curtain came up between the Eastern Bloc and the West beginning a nervous
fifty-year period called Cold War. The
region occupied by Allies became West Germany while the region under Soviet
Russia became East Germany. The capital
city Berlin, though it was deeply embedded in East Germany was shared by both
the countries, going against all common sense.
The pride of
the West did not allow it to let go of Berlin though it was cut off from West
Germany by few hundred miles. The
infamous Berlin Wall came up between the two parts of the city. In 1948, an international crisis was created
when Soviet Union blocked all the railways, road and canal access to West
Berlin. In response, the Allies started
airlifting supplies to the city. They
flew over 200,000 sorties in one year supplying everything including the daily
necessities like food and fuel. Holding
onto West Berlin surrounded by East Germany became one of the costliest
affairs. Nearly hundred people got
killed while trying to cross the border.
Shared capital of Berlin is considered one of the worst experiments
every conceived in the modern history.
From all logical standpoints it did not make any sense, and yet it was
carried out for nearly fifty years.
Shared Capital Experiment -
Chandigarh
Sikhs of
Punjab started demanding for separate state in 1940s, even before Indian
Independence. And when Indira Gandhi separated
Punjab from Haryana in 1966, she created new issues that would soon engulf the
region and the country into an internecine struggle over the next twenty five
years.
Much to
dismay and dissatisfaction of Punjab, the newly constructed capital city of
Chandigarh was converted into a Union Territory under central government to be shared
between Haryana and Punjab. Shiromani
Akali Dal led many agitations demanding Chandigarh be handed over to Punjab. Thousands of Sikhs were arrested and jailed. And on 15th August 1969, Darshan
Singh Pheruman took up fast unto death to secure the inclusion of Chandigarh
into Punjab. After 74 days of fasting he
died.
Over the
next few years, disenchantment with New Delhi grew further and Akali Dal
included other demands like no sharing of water resources and decentralization
of power, which were listed in the Anandpur Sahib Resolution of 1973. Akali
Dal joined hands with Bhrindanwale in 1982 to launch Dharam Yudh Morcha movement to demand the return of Chandigarh to
Punjab.
When
Bhrindanwale refused to cooperate with Indira Gandhi, the Indian Army launched Operation Blue Star to attack and invade
Golden Temple. That action enraged Sikhs
the world over. The anger led to
assassination of Indira Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguards in 1984, which in turn resulted in carnage
of Sikhs in various parts of India, but most savagely in New Delhi. To placate
Sikhs in Punjab, Rajiv Gandhi signed an accord promising that ‘Capital Project
Area of Chandigarh will go to Punjab’ on 26th January 1986.
And when
whole of Punjab was waiting on the night before the anointed day for the transfer to
take place, with all administrative requirements complete, and with both
Governor of Punjab and Chief Commissioner of Chandigarh standing by not knowing
who would take the salute next day on the Republic Day, the message arrived few
minutes before the midnight that Chandigarh would not be handed over to Punjab.
The next day,
the members of All India Sikh Students Federation who had earlier occupied
Golden Temple passed a resolution for creation of Khalistan - a call for secession. The rest, as they say, is
history. India witnessed the most violent
and militant movement in India resulting in large scale bloodshed, the scars of
which remain in the hearts and minds of many Indians.
Punjab did
not get Chandigarh till today and the resentment continues to linger on. On 26th March 2013, Shiromani
Akali Dal leader DS Cheema said, ‘Chandigarh was taken away from Punjab, which
was a demographic and statistical error. Nowhere has it happened that after
division of a state, it has not been given a capital. It was only in the case
of Punjab that this was done’.
Shared Capital Experiment - Bombay
Back in
1950s, Nehru attempted to experiment with Bombay city, keeping it under central
administration, but took the decision
back when there was widespread resistance from Maharashtrians. Within four years, after nearly hundred
people lost their lives, a clean solution was created. Maharashtra and Gujarat were created as two new
states in 1960. Bombay was neither a
joint capital nor union territory as demanded by Gujarathis. Bombay became part of Maharashtra – and peace
ensued. Today Mumbai is a thriving city
and home to lakhs of Gujarathis.
Experiment of Andhra Pradesh
Going
against the recommendations of Fazal Ali Commission, and succumbing to the lobbying
by Vishalandhra imperialists, Nehru created an experiment called Andhra Pradesh
by forging the ‘feudal relic’ Telangana with politically-and-economically-advanced
Andhra State. From the time they were merged, people
of Telangana have been struggling to extricate themselves out of this
experiment. Many ‘creative’ formulae
were imposed onto Telangana people to keep the experiment going against their
wishes. All those attempts, like
Telangana Regional Council, 8-point plan, 6-point formula, presidential orders,
have failed. After thousands of
agitations by Telangana people the stoical Indian Government finally conceded to
create separate state. Today, the
experiment called Andhra Pradesh stands discredited and discarded.
Experiment of ‘shared capital’ for
Telangana and Seemandhra
Now that
people of Telangana are on the verge of getting out of this farcical experiment
called Andhra Pradesh after sixty years of struggle, Indian Government is
getting ‘creative’ once again. Instead
of creating a clean solution, they are contemplating a complicated formula
called ‘shared capital’ out of Hyderabad.
Looks like Telangana has become the
perpetual guinea pig of this nation. Succumbing
to the demands from Seemandhra plutocrats and to the imaginary fears raised
by unreasonable Samaikyandhra agitations, New Delhi is about to punish Telangana
with another nonsensical experiment.
The experience
says that this experiment will spell doom for Telangana. Seemandhras will flood the city over the next
ten years to claim Hyderabad for themselves.
These intentions have already been made clear. Many Seemandhra leaders express their desire
for Hyderabad. Their wives went to New
Delhi and asked Digvijay Singh to give Hyderabad to them. APNGO leader Ashok Babu asked people of
Telangana to quit Hyderabad so that the city can be handed over to Seemandhras.
Best solution is the simple solution
There are valid and rational reasons to why Bombay and Madars were not shared. Sharing of Chandigarh led to violent movement. Keeping it simple in case of Hyderabad is the best solution. Like with
formation of nearly fourteen states that did not share a capital city, Telangana
and Seemandhra should be cleanly bifurcated without sharing capitals. Hyderabad should be given to Telangana
without conditions. Seemandhras should operate
out of a new capital city in their own region from day one after separation.
extremely stimulating blog...cheers...
ReplyDeleteby the way, i am interested in understanding a certain film speech by NTR on telegu caste. I wonder if it is sane or insane in its perspective...
I am actually using its samples so i need to know what it 'really' means ...i think NTR is talking of castes and and telengana struggle...i get a bit of it...not the whole..
here is the link..
your help will be invaluable...
thanks
here is the link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqQMDrrGPqk
my e-mail - shyamstar@gmail.com
regards...
Thanks
Good post Sujai.
ReplyDeleteSujai,
ReplyDeleteWhat do you mean by 'Seemandhras will flood the city over the next ten years to claim Hyderabad for themselves'.
Recommendation 4 of Srikrishna Committee Report
DeleteAjay here.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.indianexpress.com/news/second-coming-of-telangana/1193433/0
Sujai, I would like to know your opinion on Bhadrachalam and Aswaraopeta.
ReplyDeleteWhether Bhadrachalam and Aswaraopeta divisions belong to Telangana or the residual state of Andhra Pradesh.
Bhadrachalam and Aswaraopeta along with Northern Circars (Ganjam, Srikakulam, Visakhapatnam, Godavari etc) were under the Hyderabad State until these areas were transferred to British control in 1766.
Much later, after formation of Andhra Pradesh, these two divisions were added to the newly created Khammam district during early 1960s.