Friday, December 20, 2019

Why Indians protest against Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA)?

Imagine 4 people who have fled a neighbor country of India, because they were persecuted in that country.  Now, they are living together in a small community in India.  A Shia who is targeted as anti-Muslim and blasphemous by the Sunni majority in that country, a Ahmediya who is now considered non-Muslim in his Islamic country, a Hindu, and a Sikh.  They have been living in India now for few years.  They have come to this country because this country has always taken pride in treating all its people equally irrespective of their religion.  Asaduddin Owaisi, one of the prominent Muslim politicians from India, boasts that nobody in Pakistan or Bangladesh should worry about Indian Muslims, because Indian Muslims have far better rights than Muslims living in those countries.  He goes further to say that unlike in those countries where one sect of Islam is treated as inferior, no such ill-treatment happens to any Islamic sect in India. 

Now, comes Citizenship Amendment Act, which says that it is going to treat these migrants differently, based on their religious identity, singling out Muslims.

Because of this Act, the Hindu friend and the Sikh friend become citizens in India, whereas the Shia friend and Ahmediya friend are now shipped off to a detention center.   It dawns up on all of us living in India, that all of a sudden, this country has started to deprive someone of their basic rights based on their religious identity, even though all of them came from same country of origin. 

To understand what it means.  Let’s create another scenario.  Indians migrate to US, settle there and become citizens there.  But imagine US passes an Act, which treats Indians differently based on their religion.  It opines, since Hindus are in majority in India, they are prosperous and well off and therefore do not need to migrate, and then they go about denying Green Card and Citizenship to Indian Hindus while naturalizing Muslims and Christians from India.  How would Indian Hindus feel?  Shouldn’t Indian Hindus protest? Shouldn’t Americans protest this egregious Act that discriminates people on religious identities?

The reason why so many people in India, the Hindus, the Muslims, the Christians, across different religions, are protesting against this Act, is not because of the actual modalities of the Act.  It does not really matter if the Act affects only the immigrants or illegals and not the citizens.  What matters is that this Act allows for converting the State into saying, ‘you are special to me only if you are non-Muslim.  I will throw you out only because you are a Muslim’.  The fact that this nation has made a law that determines the eligibility of coming and living in this country, based on your religious identity, is very problematic to every Indian who has always believed in the basic tenets of Indian Constitution, that it is secular, and that it treats its people the same, whether they are Shia, Sunni, Ahmediya, Sufi, or Sikh, or Hindu, or Buddhist, or Jain. 

The reason why so many Indians are perturbed by this Act is that for the first time ever, this nation has passed a law that will determine the legal status, citizenship status, and thereby according them the basic rights, based on religious identity. 

This is anathematic to all those Indians.  We rejected the model of Pakistan that constituted itself as a religious state.   Indians are genuinely upset.  Hindus who took pride that we have always been tolerant, Muslims who took pride that while other Islamic countries discriminate their own fellow Muslims based on the sects but India doesn’t, Sikhs who believe India is their home though they are a minority, Christians, Buddhists, Jains, all living with pride that this nation is truly pluralistic unlike any other nation on this planet, they all find this Act abhorrent, dangerous because its sets a new precedent, and completely unconstitutional because it violates the basic principles of equality on which this country was founded.  


  1. Welcome back sir.... long time. A very good blog from u again as always. Hope u r doing great. Expect to see more from u now frequently.

  2. Your Arguments are wrong. CAA doesn't take away citizenship of existing indians irrespective of religion. Its a Amendment to existing citizenship Act which reduces duration of stay to get citizenship of a illegal migrants who came to India due to religious persecution. Those who came before 31st Dec 2014 and faced persecution only will get citizenship not everyone and also they should prove their case of persecution.
    Your comparision with USA hypothitical act is wrong as you are referring to Legal Migration to USA and the processs is same now in India as well whether Hindu or Muslim or any religion. They have to apply citizenship act of 1955. Adnan Sami a PAK muslim has got citizenship

    If you come to USA illegally you will be deported. Your comparision of Shia or Ahmediya in PAK with other minorities is wrong. Dont create hypothitical case. Are there any exisitng Shias or Ahmediyas who came to India from PAK before 2014 due to relious persecution? Its NO as per the statistics. Also Shias and Ahmediyas of PAK are not our resposibilities as they supported partition. Also we can't have unlimited cases for granting citizenship. Why not african refugees, syrian refugees etc...
    German can work in France and viceversa as they are part of EU where as Indian needs VISA/WP, you can't call it discrimination. Granting Citizenship to a person of neighbouring country is a Policy decision, it has nothing to do with equality. Every country depending on its Population, Area, culture, economy, needs etc.. has a immigration policy and rules for granting citizenship. its not uniform across.You need to have a resonable classification and GOVT of India has comeup with a reasonable classification of CAA to give citizenship to relious minorities of 3 neighbouring countries. Its like saying I'm doing charity to 10 people and you are asking whynot 20 or 30 people. Rightnow thats whats govt wants to do, the bill may not be generous or magnanimous but not wrong

    Do you think all who are protesting are honestly committed to secularism, democracy, human rights? Then why so much violence ? Its nothing to do with CAA, its some anger against GOVT for various other reasons

  3. Congratulations Sujoy for your new venture into creating movies. Pressure Cooker movie has excellent public talk in Hyderabad. I have been following this page since 8 years and you have surprised everyone every time. All the very best for your next films. Cheers!

  4. I think, Citizenship act is a badly worded Asylum law. Even USA has asylum laws that don't have any religion explicitly stated on paper. Imagine if a Muslim person from a Muslim country applying for asylum on basis of Religious persecution ? Of course they are going to reject the application.

  5. Since the ACT has already been passed and that there seems to be no way the government is taking the ACT back (o not for another 4 years at least) despite large scale protest and unrest, isn't it better to feel that at least some are benefitting from the ACT and give up the protests? Government isn't bothered about protests! I would have personally loved if government had included atheists,ahmaddiyas, rohingyas and tamilians from srilanka

  6. Useful and authentic Contents or information, my authentic website is similar to your wesite and we request for backlink's exchange.


Dear Commenters:
Please identify yourself. At least use a pseudonym. Otherwise there will be too many *Anonymous*; making it confusing.

Do NOT write personal information or whereabouts about the author or other commenters. You are free to write about yourself. Please do not use abusive language. Do not indulge in personal attacks and insults.

Write comments which are relevant and make sense so that the debate remains healthy.