India constantly refers to
many Muslim Presidents they have had to showcase its tolerance and equal
treatment of Muslims. Nowadays many
Indian Hindus repeatedly take the example of our erstwhile President, Abdul
Kalam. They say, ‘Look! We have had a
Muslim as our President. And he was
selected by a Hindu Party!’ By saying this, they want to showcase India as a tolerant
and magnanimous country that allows anyone to become the President of India,
even a Muslim. These Hindus also refer
to the three Khans who dominate Indian Hindi Cinema – Shah Rukh Khan, Salman
Khan and Amir Khan. And they point out
the cricketers like Yusuf Pathan and musician like AR Rahman. They use these examples to say that Muslims
are not discriminated in India, that they are not marginalized, that they get
the same access to education and opportunity, that they are not unequal, that
they are not second-class citizens.
According to these Hindus,
the Muslims are in fact ‘appeased’, they are given certain sops unnecessarily,
like subsidies on Haj, and they are given special treatment unnecessarily, like
special personal laws. These people
think that these ‘appeasing’ measures have a definite purpose - only to win
votes. They believe that Muslims are so
naïve, so innocent that they could be beguiled by such silly sops, like Haj
subsidy, to form a single vote bank.