I was watching TIMES NOW on TV. This is some time ago, but relevant even today.
One guy says, ‘Let us have freedoms. Let us talk about freedoms. We should have freedoms. But don’t push it to ridiculous extent. Like Azadi. Why Azadi? From whom? I find this whole Azadi thing ridiculous’.
The other guy says, ‘Think of nation’s sentiments. Respect India’s sentiments. Let’s live together. Think in the right perspective.’
The anchor says, ‘Why are you taking support from Pakistan? Isn’t that country the one which is intolerant? Pakistan is the one which is intolerant. Not India. Aren’t Mohajirs discriminated in Pakistan? Why do you want to take refuge in Pakistan’s support?’
And I find something grossly wrong with the whole proceedings though most of my Indian brothers and sisters are OK with these discussions. Today, once again Kashmir is burning. More than 20 protestors were shot dead by the Indian forces stationed in Kashmir. According to TIMES OF INDIA, In Iraq, there is 1 soldier every 166 people, and in Kashmir, there is 1 for every 20, nearly 8 times more. It’s like living in the Bangalore city with nearly 3 lakh troops, one-fourth of Indian Army.
In the discussion above, the first guy thinks that we all should have freedoms, but not Azadi (freedom). Whom are we duping here? Why is Azadi a ridiculous proposition? We all want to be free. Every human being wants to be free. Who wants to wake up to face the gun on a daily basis? Who wants armies stationed in their towns and villages on a daily basis? Who wants their sisters raped, brothers killed, uncles gone missing?












